Thursday, 13 May 2010

An International Design Competition?

A letter to Scottish Enterprise from the Royal Institute of Architects in Scotland:


12th May 2010


Dear Ms McGinlay,

Proposed Union Terrace Gardens Competition

I am writing further to a worrying telephone call from one of your colleagues, Nicola Moore, which was taken by the RIAS Depute Secretary, Sharon McCord, late in the day on 29th April. The call concerned a proposed competition for Union Terrace Gardens to effectively fill the existing valley and create a new public square on its roof, on a level with the surrounding streetscape.

Our concerns arise not because this proposal is relatively prosaic and therefore would offer very limited opportunities for architectural inventiveness. Rather we are concerned at a number of specifics of the call and in what we view as an inadequate consultative and feasibility process, prior to the launch of a major and costly competition. We are profoundly concerned that a premature or inappropriate competition would simply abuse participants who inevitably will put significantly greater resources into any competitive process than would be covered by any competition fee on offer.

Your officer suggested that you had been advised to approach a London based consultancy to manage the competition. That is a concern. She further suggested that there was a shared desire that the competition should be won by an “international” architect. On being pressed on this latter issue and advised that this seemed an inappropriate aspiration for a government funded Scottish organisation, she made it clear that what was being sought was a winner, certainly from out-with Scotland, with a known name.

Sharon made the point that such an aspiration runs quite counter to European procurement legislation as well as being offensive to indigenous talent. Your officer was assured that there are many practices in Scotland more than capable of undertaking very substantial architectural projects and that these should be given an opportunity equal to that of any potential international entrant.

A further significant concern is the much publicised budget for this proposal. You will be well aware that the highest profile architectural competition in Scotland in recent years was that for the Scottish Parliament and the lengthy and difficult process which ensued from the risible budget initially set for that endeavour. Considering that, in recent years, buildings of comparable scale in Aberdeen and elsewhere in Scotland on straightforward urban sites have cost easily twice the quoted budget figure for this particularly problematic and challenging site we would be very concerned about launching a competition based upon such a questionable budget.

Our final concern is that the public consultation for this proposal failed to take into account alternative proposals for the site and therefore did not give the people of Aberdeen the opportunity to comment on a breadth of proposals as would normally be the case in such a process. Our local Chapter, the Aberdeen Society of Architects, has written to the leader of the Council and others, indicating their significant concerns on the matter. At the RIAS Council meeting of 17th March 2010, it was agreed that our President would put in writing to the leader of the Council, the Incorporation’s extreme reservations about the efficacy and fairness of this process.

It is our view that pursuing a competition against a background of such significant doubt and unease, particularly a competition with the objectives stated by your colleague, would be counter to best procurement practice. This seems a thoroughly premature endeavour with so many questions remaining unanswered.


Yours sincerely,





Neil Baxter
Secretary & Treasurer

6 comments:

mike shepherd said...

Priceless Fraser! Looks like the queue to hate ACSEF is getting longer and longer ...

Iain Richardson said...

Just brilliant.

Anonymous said...

From the advice i have received, a Judicial review must be sought on the the decsion making process, blighted on wednesday by the ill informed..
S

Anonymous said...

What is Sustainable Development?
Sustainable Development is a key principle (alongside Social Inclusion) for the Council and its Community Planning Partners and is about ensuring a better quality of life for all who live, work or visit Aberdeen, for now and for the future.

Sustainable Development is about incomes and money, health, housing and education, a safe and pleasant environment and access to transport, leisure and other services.
It is about empowering people and communities to play their part in making sure that Aberdeen and its citizens thrive in the future.
Sustainable Development is also about protecting and where possible enhancing the environment, not just for its own sake but because a damaged environment will eventually hold back economic development and compromise everyone's' quality of life.

Righty ho here we go:

Sustainable Development is a key principle 'alongside Social Inclusion' well that is clearly not the case as the city council have excluded the opions of its public and the proposals on the table are not principled nor sustainable.

Sustainable Development 'a safe and pleasant environment and access to transport, leisure and other services. Which we have already, the pleasant environment being Union Terrace Gardens; the transport intersections being 2 minutes away and lots of leisure facilities, excluding the wondreful Art Deco Baths, but hey needs must.

'It is about empowering people and communities to play their part in making sure that Aberdeen and its citizens thrive in the future.'
Clearly not the case. The City Council has anything but empowered the people, only alienated them. We cannot thrive in the future if we are paying for an unwanted scheme in the form of TIF.

Sustainable Development is also about protecting and where possible enhancing the environment, not just for its own sake but because a damaged environment will eventually hold back economic development and compromise everyone's' quality of life.'

Well done to whoever wrote this. A damaged environment will indeed hold back economic development and will indeed compromise if not destroy quality of life.

Thankyou, Aberdeen City Council for your good work and lets hope we can indeed promote social inclusion in the immediate future.


(Source; Aberdeen city council website)

Anonymous said...

Awesome web site, I had not come across fraserdenholm.blogspot.com previously during my searches!
Continue the great work!

Anonymous said...

From the advice i have received, a Judicial review must be sought on the the decsion making process
custom fabricationpet hair vacuum